Julia Grabher vs Anouk Koevermans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Jul at 08:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Grabher vs A. Koevermans

AUT
1
Win
Played
1
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-To-Head: Grabher 1 - 1 Koevermans
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Grabher | 1 |
Koevermans | 1 |
Last H2H Matches:
No past h2h event happened.
J. Grabher vs A. Koevermans H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$402,254 | Career Prize Money | $84,500 |
60.24% (409-270) | Career Total W/L | 60.71% (170-110) |
1 | Clay | 1 |
17 | Titles | 2 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
21.43% (3-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
J. Grabher vs A. Koevermans Match Preview
- Looking at second serve performance, Grabher has a slight edge over Koevermans, winning 38.44% compared to 38.27% over the past six months. Does this give Grabher an advantage? Marginally, yes.
- When it comes to return game prowess, Koevermans leads, having won 51.77% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Grabher's 48.26%. Could this make a difference? It's likely significant.
- In high-pressure scenarios, Koevermans is better at saving breakpoints with a 46.84% success rate over Grabher's 43.57%. This might be an asset during pivotal moments in the match.
- Overall match performance over the past year sees Grabher slightly ahead, having won 63.86% of matches, while Koevermans is at 60%.
- Surface preferences show that Grabher excels on clay with a 65% win rate, whereas this surface hasn't been specified as best for Koevermans, whose best is on I. hard surfaces and has a 62% win rate there.
- Considering tournament levels, Grabher's winning percentage is higher in Challengers/ITF tournaments, suggesting a strong ability in lower-tier events.
- The head-to-head record favors Grabher with one victory in their sole encounter, supporting her potential for another win.
- Extreme pressure scenarios also favor Grabher, who has won the only tiebreak played between them.
- Opponent quality analysis indicates Grabher has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 266.41 against Koevermans's 304.18.
- Interestingly, both players have an identical performance in deciding sets, each winning 47% in their last 12 months of play.
- Koevermans has an edge in breakpoint conversion in recent form with 47.47% compared to Grabher's 36.65%, highlighting Koevermans as potentially more decisive.
Editorial Prediction (July 26, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance data and historical matchups, both Grabher and Koevermans exhibit strengths that could influence the match outcome.
Grabher's strong second serve performance and familiarity with tough competition give her an upper hand, especially given her comfort on clay surfaces where this match will be played.
Koevermans, however, demonstrates superior breakpoint conversion and return game stats, which suggest she can capitalize on important opportunities.
Considering head-to-head stats and overall form on the anticipated surface, Grabher appears more likely to secure the win in this encounter.
Julia Grabher vs Anouk Koevermans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Grabher vs A. Koevermans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 2 |
27 | Games Won | 23 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:50:56 | Avg. Match Time | 1:50:56 |
70% (104/149) | 1st Serve % | 66% (81/123) |
66% (69/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (57/81) |
56% (25/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (21/42) |
80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
37% (45/123) | Return Pts Won % | 37% (55/149) |
50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Grabher Recent Matches Played
A. Koevermans Recent Matches Played

J. Grabher vs A. Koevermans Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.24% (409/270) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.71% (170/110) |
58.82% (904/633) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.53% (374/265) |
54.04% (7500/6378) | Games Win/Loss | 53.51% (3170/2754) |
44.78% (30/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (36/24) |
65.15% (359/192) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.88% (112/69) |
34.55% (19/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.76% (21/13) |
16.67% (1/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
727 | Aces Total | 406 |
0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.52 |
2538 | Total Double Faults | 1509 |
1:21:58 | Average Match Time | 1:35:39 |
475.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 403.56 |
65% (24708/38192) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10314/16754) |
62% (15393/24708) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6399/10314) |
45% (6023/13482) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (2575/6440) |
49% (2463/5028) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1181/2326) |
47% (18178/38768) | Return Points Win % | 49% (8201/16902) |
34.48% (10/19) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
47.06% (8/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
31.82% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
33.90% (20/39) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
63.36% (268/155) | Challenger W/L | 63.79% (111/63) |
74.42% (96/33) | Futures W/L | 59.57% (56/38) |
60% (402/666) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (169/278) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
49% (64/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (33/61) |
53% (98/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (46/81) |
90% (398/357) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (172/150) |
10% (398/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (172/22) |
19% (281/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (108/20) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
